ARIN and IPv6 Requests
Chris Woodfield
rekoil at semihuman.com
Thu Feb 24 06:10:41 UTC 2011
(Yeah, high reply latency...)
Is Carrier V still filtering at sub-/32 on their IPv6 peerings? Last I was in a position to check, not even Apple's /45 was visible from inside AS701.
-C
On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Eric Clark wrote:
> Don't remember about the v4 part, but 3 years ago they issued me a /48, specifically for my first site and indicated that a block was reserved for additional sites. I can probably dig that up.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Jason Iannone <jason.iannone at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It also looks like there isn't a policy for orgs with multiple
>> multihomed sites to get a /48 per site. Is there an exception policy
>> somewhere?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:50 PM, <ADWebb at dstsystems.com> wrote:
>>> Initial. Documenting IPv4 usage is in the request template.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adam Webb
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From:
>>> "Nick Olsen" <nick at flhsi.com>
>>> To:
>>> <nanog at nanog.org>
>>> Date:
>>> 02/10/2011 01:45 PM
>>> Subject:
>>> re: ARIN and IPv6 Requests
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We requested our initial allocation without any such questions. Is this
>>> your initial or additional?
>>>
>>> Nick Olsen
>>> Network Operations
>>> (855) FLSPEED x106
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: ADWebb at dstsystems.com
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:38 PM
>>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>>> Subject: ARIN and IPv6 Requests
>>>
>>> Why does ARIN require detailed usage of IPv4 space when requesting IPv6
>>> space? Seems completely irrelevant to me.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adam Webb
>>> EN & ES Team
>>> desk: 816.737.9717
>>> cell: 916.949.1345
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> The biggest secret of innovation is that anyone can do it.
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>> Please consider the environment before printing this email and any
>>> attachments.
>>>
>>> This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the
>>> individual or company to which it is addressed and may contain
>>> information which is privileged, confidential and prohibited from
>>> disclosure or unauthorized use under applicable law. If you are
>>> not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified
>>> that any use, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail or the
>>> information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the
>>> sender. If you have received this transmission in error, please
>>> return the material received to the sender and delete all copies
>>> from your system.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list