"Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers

Robert Bonomi bonomi at mail.r-bonomi.com
Fri Feb 11 05:19:49 UTC 2011


> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com at nanog.org  Thu Feb 10 20:35:01 2011
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:31:32 -0600
> From: Jack Bates <jbates at brightok.net>
> To: John Curran <jcurran at arin.net>
> Subject: Re: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers
> Cc: NANOG <nanog at merit.edu>
>
> On 2/10/2011 8:15 PM, John Curran wrote:
> > I'm not certain that you could rely on any organizations statements 
> > made today to provide any assurance that circumstances would not change 
> > in the future and result in the address space being returned to ARIN or 
> > transferred per current policy.
>
> An official statement from the DoD? I'm sure we could hold them to it as 
> a community. Is it too much for us to ask the US government to give us 
> assurance that we can safely utilize huge chunks of address space 
> assigned to them for purposes such as LSN without fear? :)

Even the DoD cannot say "for sure" that they would never route some of that
space 'in time of need' over the public internet.





More information about the NANOG mailing list