Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Wed Feb 9 22:46:45 UTC 2011
Try looking for the expanded terms:
Large Scale NAT
Carrier Grade NAT
NAT444
Owen
On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:58 AM, david raistrick wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Scott Helms wrote:
>
>> For ISPs in this circumstance the choice will be CGNAT rather than IPv6 for a number of years because the cost is much lower and according to the vendors selling CGNAT solutions the impact to end users is (almost) unnoticeable.
>
> Anyone care to define CGNAT? Google results for this are either unrelated or "CGNAT will save us" or "CGNAT doesnt count" - no rfcs, no explainations, nothing....
>
>
>
> --
> david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> drais at icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list