Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

Wed Feb 9 20:33:51 UTC 2011

On 9 feb 2011, at 21:23, George Bonser wrote:

> While that is true, it is no worse than the situation right now.  In the
> US, the vast majority of users are already behind a NAT (I would say
> over 90% of them are) so they are already experiencing this breakage.  

There's a big difference between being able to have uPNP IGD or NAT-PMP open up holes in the NAT (or do it manually) and being 100% incapable of getting any and all incoming sessions. And between having 64k ports for a home and having 64k ports for 100, 1000, 10000 ? homes.