Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

Wed Feb 9 19:58:34 UTC 2011

On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Scott Helms wrote:

> For ISPs in this circumstance the choice will be CGNAT rather than IPv6 for a 
> number of years because the cost is much lower and according to the vendors 
> selling CGNAT solutions the impact to end users is (almost) unnoticeable.

Anyone care to define CGNAT?  Google results for this are either unrelated 
or "CGNAT will save us" or "CGNAT doesnt count" - no rfcs, no 
explainations, nothing....

--
david raistrick        http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
drais at icantclick.org             http://www.expita.com/nomime.html