Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
Jack Bates
jbates at brightok.net
Sun Feb 6 04:10:11 UTC 2011
On 2/5/2011 9:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> In IPv6, we should be looking to do 5 or 10 year allocations. We can
> afford to be fairly speculative in
> our allocations in order to preserve greater aggregation.
>
And even if networks were only getting an 8 bit slide, that's 256 trips
back to the RIR to get to their current allocations sizes (over 1000
years if they had to return once every 5 years). However, 12-16 bit
slides seem more common (perhaps John knows the exact slide ratio,
though I suspect many ISPs haven't really nailed down what they need in
v6 yet) and that can exceed 10 year allocation rates for some ISPs.
Jack
More information about the NANOG
mailing list