Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN

Jack Bates jbates at brightok.net
Sun Feb 6 04:10:11 UTC 2011


On 2/5/2011 9:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> In IPv6, we should be looking to do 5 or 10 year allocations. We can 
> afford to be fairly speculative in
> our allocations in order to preserve greater aggregation.
>

And even if networks were only getting an 8 bit slide, that's 256 trips 
back to the RIR to get to their current allocations sizes (over 1000 
years if they had to return once every 5 years). However, 12-16 bit 
slides seem more common (perhaps John knows the exact slide ratio, 
though I suspect many ISPs haven't really nailed down what they need in 
v6 yet) and that can exceed 10 year allocation rates for some ISPs.


Jack




More information about the NANOG mailing list