Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Sat Feb 5 16:08:09 UTC 2011
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <4D4CA1B1.5060002 at brightok.net>, Jack Bates writes:
> > On 2/4/2011 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > >
> > > I used to work for CSIRO. Their /16's which were got back in the
> > > late 80's will now be /48's.
> >
> > That's why I didn't try doing any adjustments of X is the new /32. The
> > whole paradigm changes.
>
> So why the ~!#! are you insisting on comparing IPv4 allocations with IPv6
> alocations.
"..96 more bits - no majik.."
> Mark
--bill
More information about the NANOG
mailing list