Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN

bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Sat Feb 5 16:08:09 UTC 2011


On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> 
> In message <4D4CA1B1.5060002 at brightok.net>, Jack Bates writes:
> > On 2/4/2011 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > >
> > > I used to work for CSIRO.  Their /16's which were got back in the
> > > late 80's will now be /48's.
> > 
> > That's why I didn't try doing any adjustments of X is the new /32. The 
> > whole paradigm changes.
> 
> So why the ~!#! are you insisting on comparing IPv4 allocations with IPv6
> alocations.

	"..96 more bits - no majik.."

> Mark

--bill




More information about the NANOG mailing list