quietly....

Jack Bates jbates at brightok.net
Wed Feb 2 05:10:49 UTC 2011


On 2/1/2011 10:19 PM, John Curran wrote:
> I don't believe we've had an IPv6 "additional" request yet (but I look
> forward to it happening at some point:-).  I will check and get back
> to the list with the definitive answer.
>

I believe that the changing of IPv6 policy leads to "redo's", and I 
expect to see expansions again if current proposals are accepted. I 
don't believe enough eyeballs have been assigned address space yet with 
current policy to draw necessity yet. Further expansions would likely 
reduce that necessity even further.


Jack




More information about the NANOG mailing list