quietly....
David Barak
thegameiam at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 1 22:43:35 UTC 2011
________________________________
From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com>
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
>If you're determined to destroy IPv6 by bringing the problems of NAT forward
>with you, then, I'm fine with you remaining in your >IPv4 island. I'm willing to
>bet that most organizations will embrace an internet unencumbered by the
>brokenness that is NAT and >move forward. I do not think that lack of NAT has
>been a significant barrier to IPv6 adoption, nor do I think it will be.
Lack of NAT may or may not continue to be a barrier to IPv6 adoption. However,
it certainly *has* been a barrier to IPv6 adoption - I have had customers tell
me that explicitly, and I have no reason to doubt them.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list