Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Thu Dec 29 06:17:17 UTC 2011
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:51:00 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
> Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> > Quick sanity check on the hypothesis: Does Windows ship with an IGP enabled by
> > default?
> Sanity check with Windows? Are you sure?
It's a quick sanity check to this statment:
>> According to the end to end argument, the only possible solution
>> to the problem, with no complete or correct alternatives, is to
>> let hosts directly participate in IGP activities.
If it's the "only possible spolution", how come 99.8% of the end nodes
do just fine without it? Oh yeah..
> Note that the end to end argument has the following
> statement I omitted to quote:
> (Sometimes an incomplete version of the function provided
> by the communication system may be useful as a performance
> enhancement.)
> That is, there are incomplete solutions by intermediate systems
> which sometimes work.
For "sometimes" == 99.8% of the net.
> If you are saying SLAAC is not enough in your case with
> complicated manual management, I don't think I have to
> argue against you on how to simplify it.
It got simplfied with a handful of static routes and no IGP and no SLAAC
and no DHCP of any flavor. ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111229/9a7a9840/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list