local_preference for transit traffic?

Thu Dec 15 16:15:50 UTC 2011

On Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:42:37 PM Leo Bicknell 
wrote:

> However, there may be a simpler explanation.  If you bill
> by the bit as a transit provider it's in your best
> interest to make sure your customer gets as many bits
> through you as possible.  Plus if you can fill their
> pipe, they need to buy an upgrade to you.

Indeed.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111216/6c8bbf42/attachment.sig>