Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
Sun Aug 21 03:41:33 UTC 2011
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> You could ask that they withdraw the prefixes and see if that works?
whois 46.96.0.0
inetnum: 46.96.0.0 - 46.96.39.255
netname: LINKTEL-MAN-ETHERNET-EXTENSION
Updated: 2011-03-15 *************
e-mail: noc at link-telecom.net
whois link-telecom.net
Domain Name: LINK-TELECOM.NET
Creation Date: 16-aug-2011 *************
Would YOU filter announcements from YOUR customer based solely on an
email request from noc at link-telecom.net?
The Spamhaus reports appear credible, as does the RIPE registration
issue with those prefixes. If I was InterNAP, I think I'd challenge my
customer about them. Start of business Monday morning.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the NANOG
mailing list