Announcement of University of Washington routing study
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Thu Aug 18 19:38:21 CDT 2011
On behalf of the community, if I may be so bold (and I'm sure others will speak up if they disagree), thank you for the notice of this experiment.
Also, thank you for doing the research.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 19:32, Ethan Katz-Bassett <ethan at cs.washington.edu> wrote:
> Hi NANOG,
> From August 24 to October 4, the University of Washington and Georgia Tech
> will conduct an Internet routing study using AS-PATH poisoning. The study
> will *only* affect the Georgia Tech experimental prefix
> 220.127.116.11/19(and its sub-prefixes). The prefix serves *no active
> users/services* so the
> study should not affect any production prefixes or users. We plan to insert
> AS numbers into our announcements to route around some networks. We will
> always start AS-PATHs with our own ASN 47065. We will limit ourselves to at
> most 10 announcement changes per hour (and generally will change the
> announcement for a given sub-prefix at most every 90 minutes).
> This experiment is almost identical to one that Georgia Tech conducted in
> June and July without problems or complaints
> (http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2011-June/037527.html), so we do
> not anticipate any issues. Others have done similar studies in the past
> (e.g., Randy Bush et al.:
> If, for any reason, you want us not to include your ASN in announcements for
> our prefix, please opt-out at any time before August 24 at:
> http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9P2TD7T . A few ASes opted out of the
> previous Georgia Tech study, and we will continue to honor those opt-outs.
> Please feel free to contact me directly with any questions.
> Ethan Katz-Bassett
> University of Washington
More information about the NANOG