OSPF vs IS-IS
Joel Jaeggli
joelja at bogus.com
Fri Aug 12 01:39:04 UTC 2011
On Aug 11, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> The only reason in my opinion to run IS-IS rather than OSPF today is
>> due to the fact that IS-IS is decoupled from IP making it less
>> vulnerable to attacks.
>
> how about simpler and more stable?
not rooted to a particular area.
supports more than one AFI at the same time
isn't dependent on ip addressing to form an adjacency
etc
> randy
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list