Experience with Juniper MX-80s
Mark Meijerink
Mark.Meijerink at vancis.nl
Thu Aug 11 20:08:53 UTC 2011
Babak,
For one of our customers we run two MX-80's. Both with two full routing peers plus a lot of other smaller BGP peerings at a local IX. So far no strange behaviour or poor performance. Peerings are all IPv4 and IPv6. I don't know if you would need specific features but for the basic border router functionality it seems to perform as expected.
Regards,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Babak Pasdar [mailto:bpasdar at batblue.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:44 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Experience with Juniper MX-80s
Hello NANOG Group,
I am curious if anyone has any experiences positive or negative with Juniper MX-80s. Our recent experience with Juniper has not been great both in terms of new product offerings (SRX) and software bugs in the recent revs of Junos for the MX platform. I want to know if the MX-80 functions as advertised and in specific can properly handle two full IPv4 and IPv6 BGP feeds
Thanks in advance,
Babak
--
Babak Pasdar
President & CEO | Certified Ethical Hacker
Bat Blue Corporation | Integrity . Privacy . Availability . Performance
(p) 212.461.3322 x3005 | (f) 212.584.9999 | (w) www.BatBlue.com
Bat Blue is proud to be the Official WiFi Provider for ESPN's X Games
Bat Blue's AS: 25885 | BGP Policy | Peering Policy
Receive Bat Blue's Daily Security Intelligence Report
Bat Blue's Legal Notice
More information about the NANOG
mailing list