dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
froomkin at law.miami.edu
Wed Aug 3 20:47:39 UTC 2011
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
[...]
> No, my point is that if you use RFC-4193, there's not really much benefit
> from altering the prefix, so, nobody gets penalized and you can still have
> static addresses.
[...]
If anyone is aware of any other widely-used applications in home/office
computing, or apps or devices in mobile telecoms, that use RFC-4193 *by
default* I would be very interested to learn about them for a paper I am
working on.
--
A. Michael Froomkin, http://www.law.tm Blog: http://www.discourse.net
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
Editor, Jotwell: The Journal of Things We Like (Lots), jotwell.com
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | froomkin at law.tm
-->It's hot here.<--
More information about the NANOG
mailing list