dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Wed Aug 3 07:14:38 UTC 2011
On Aug 2, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <CAJvB4tnPS4CsJSf37sc4a4mqOx0UuWKvPNiEcoFqaLXOwk+VmA at mail.gmail.com>
> , Blake Dunlap writes:
>> Or, alternately, don't care what your printer's ridiculously long IPv6 IP is
>> at this moment, (ULA/GUA/assigned: it really doesn't matter) and use mdns
>> like normal people. Otherwise we're ignoring the forest for the trees, I
>> don't expect to try to explain to my grandma how to type in
>> 2001:45ea:344b:dead:beef::27 and/or remember it, when "printer1" will do.
>>
>> This just makes me think of this: http://bash.org/?14258
>>
>> If we need a way to mdns to work across subnet boundries in a single
>> administrative domain, so be it. If we need a better mdns, lets make that
>> too, but we *really* need to get away from direct IPs in general.
>
> You are totally missing the point which is that the printer has a
> *routable* address when the home, with possibly multiple subnets,
> is disconnected or has never connected to the global network.
>
> link-locals are insufficient for a routed home.
>
I get that and I have that with GUA without resorting to ULA.
Owen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110803/51e3b235/attachment.bin>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list