IPv4 address exchange
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Tue Apr 19 20:45:57 UTC 2011
John,
Given ARIN's STLS, it would seem even ARIN has the 'right perspective' to see the "up$ide". It's more about the implication of folks having increasing financial incentive to go outside the existing mechanisms (e.g., Nortel/Microsoft) and the implications that has on network operations.
Since it would seem we have an impedance mismatch on this topic, I'll not bore NANOG with further discussion.
Regards,
-drc
On Apr 19, 2011, at 11:37 AM, John Curran wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Jeff Wheeler <jsw at inconcepts.biz> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how a bunch of different
>> entities providing fragmented "post-allocation services" is of any
>> benefit.
>
> Jeff -
>
> Imagine for a moment that you had quite a few
> unneeded addresses and the upheaval also meant
> no pesky policy constraints on your monetization efforts -
> would you then view it as having some benefit? You just
> might not have the right perspective to appreciate the
> potential up$ide...
>
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list