Top-posting (was: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to anAlternative? )

Tue Apr 12 15:18:30 UTC 2011

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:49:17 BST, Tim Chown said:

> Well indeed, top-posting is just so much more efficient given the
> volumes of email most of us probably see each day.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129565913825601&w=2

Go read that thread.  115 messages and counting.  Read *all* of them. Then
think how much longer it would have taken if everybody had top posted.

Second note in the thread - new text is:

RIP to this guy, won't be missed :)

You *really* want to have read the context on that before reading the comment.
If top-posted, it leaves you thinking something entirely different ;)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110412/4ef24d75/attachment.sig>