v6 Avian Carriers?

Thu Apr 7 19:35:53 UTC 2011

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
> Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
> 
> That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny 
> that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the contrary.

Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now.  rfc6214 gives us a new
brown M&M to put into the contracts...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110407/56fa9764/attachment.sig>