v6 Avian Carriers?

Sat Apr 2 01:07:09 UTC 2011

It's also especially sensitive to icing induced packet loss.

Owen

On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:30 AM, GP Wooden wrote:

> I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ... 
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Scott Morris" <swm at emanon.com>
> Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 9:01 am
> Subject: v6 Avian Carriers?
> To: <nanog at nanog.org>
> 
> Mmm...  Good question.  Would it actually come back OUT in a
> recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
> 
> I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross.   ;)
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
>> I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on.   Now I know.  So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
>> 
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
>> 
>> 
>> Marc
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 