v6 Avian Carriers?
Dorn Hetzel
dorn at hetzel.org
Fri Apr 1 17:28:55 UTC 2011
I'm thinking both TCP and UDP, and for ICMP don't NAT's use the sequence
number field to keep them separate ?
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Justin M. Streiner
<streiner at cluebyfour.org>wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
>
> I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for "fractional
>> DHCP" where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
>> 155.229.10.20:1024-2047. Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
>> carrier NAT would have other shares of the same public IP. :)
>>
>
> Would the end-user get both the TCP and UDP ports from their assigned
> range? Also, how would you handle ICMP/ESP/etc... or would those be 'free
> with the purchase of..."?
>
> jms
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list