Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA

Zaid Ali zaid at zaidali.com
Tue Oct 19 23:25:12 UTC 2010


On 10/19/10 3:58 PM, "Mark Andrews" <marka at isc.org> wrote:

> Adding is seperate IPv6 server is a work around and runs the risk
> of being overloaded.

And what a wonderful problem to have! You can show a CFO a nice cacti graph
of IPv6 growth so you can justify him/her to sign off on IPv6 expenses. A
CFO will never act unless there is a real business problem. There are some
of us here who have management with clue but there are many that don't,
sadly this is the majority and a large contributor to the slow adoption of
IPv6.

Zaid






More information about the NANOG mailing list