Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption

Jack Bates jbates at brightok.net
Mon Oct 18 20:10:35 UTC 2010


On 10/18/2010 1:20 PM, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
>
> I still haven't seen any good argument for why residential users need
> /48s. No, I don't think "that makes all the address assignments the
> same size" is a particularly relevant or convincing argument.
>
> We're doing /56 for residential users, and have no plans to change
> this.

+1

This not only makes pop assignments easier, it gives a much larger 
prefix rotation pool. Don't start the flame on rotating prefixes being 
evil. It's my implementation to at least give customers some chance at 
prefix privacy.


Jack




More information about the NANOG mailing list