Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption
Jack Bates
jbates at brightok.net
Mon Oct 18 20:10:35 UTC 2010
On 10/18/2010 1:20 PM, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
>
> I still haven't seen any good argument for why residential users need
> /48s. No, I don't think "that makes all the address assignments the
> same size" is a particularly relevant or convincing argument.
>
> We're doing /56 for residential users, and have no plans to change
> this.
+1
This not only makes pop assignments easier, it gives a much larger
prefix rotation pool. Don't start the flame on rotating prefixes being
evil. It's my implementation to at least give customers some chance at
prefix privacy.
Jack
More information about the NANOG
mailing list