Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption - Sparse IPv6 allocation

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Mon Oct 18 19:27:39 UTC 2010


Randy - 
 
  We'll likely put that out to the ARIN community for consultation
  at the point in time when becomes a potential issue. I expect we 
  will have plenty of time before that needs to be considered at the
  present rate of allocation.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:

> John,
> 
> Can you tell us at what degree the bisection stops?  i.e. does it keep going until there are no spaces left, or will you leave some space in between each one to leave some room for future needs for orgs that already have allocations?
> 
> 
> -Randy
> 
> --
> | Randy Carpenter
> | Vice President, IT Services
> | Red Hat Certified Engineer
> | First Network Group, Inc.
> | (419)739-9240, x1
> ----
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Oct 18, 2010, at 2:18 PM, David Conrad wrote:
>>> On Oct 18, 2010, at 6:59 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>>>> ARIN does reservations (unsure at what length, but at least down to
>>>> /31).
>>> 
>>> Do they still do that? Back when I was at IANA, one of the
>>> justifications the RIRs gave for the /12s they received was that
>>> they were going to be using the 'bisection' method of allocation
>>> which removes the need for reservation. Last I heard, APNIC was
>>> using the bisection method...
>> 
>> ARIN is doing the same (the 'bisection' method) with our IPv6
>> management
>> since January 2010: we refer to the "sparse allocation" approach and
>> it
>> was requested by the community during the ARIN/NANOG Dearborn meeting.
>> 
>> FYI,
>> /John
>> 
>> John Curran
>> President and CEO
>> ARIN





More information about the NANOG mailing list