New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft

Thu Oct 7 02:44:49 UTC 2010

On 7/10/10 6:28 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> On 10/6/10 10:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> Number resources are not and should not be associated with domain
>> resources at the policy level. This would make absolutely no sense
>> whatsoever.
> 
> hmm. ... "are not" ... so the event complained of ... didn't happen?

The key issue here is more the "should not" aspect, which I agree with,
but that these records are frequently used by netops to verify a
request.  There really needs to be a greater standardised level of due
diligence regarding advertisement requests that checks more than whether
a request is coming from a seemingly legitimate email address.

Regards,
Ben

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20101007/0d8ecf3a/attachment.sig>