ARIN Fraud Reporting Form ... Don't waste your time

Fri Oct 1 18:07:58 UTC 2010

In message <20101001123356.GA10880 at vacation.karoshi.com.>, 
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

>On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:10:12AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> 
>> No, it's kind of like asking the DMV whether the car belongs to the thief
>> or to someone else.  They keep the records for Christ's sake!  They *can*
>> take a position on that rudumentary, simple, and basic question, and they
>> should.  And that is all I ask or expect them to do.  But they don't
>> even want to do that miniscule amount of work, apparently.  They want to
>> be the Keeper of the Records, but then they want to roll over and play
>> dead, or ignorant, or agnostic, whenever somebody has the temerrity to
>> simply ask them what the f**king records they are keeping *mean* about
>> who actually owns what.
>> 
>> I already said it, but I'll say it again for the benefit of those with
>> low reading comprehension.  Nobody is asking ARIN to go out, with guns
>> drawn, and pull the plug themselves.  But they can and should take a
>> position on who owns what.  That is a judicial function, not a police
>> function.  If you don't understand the distinction, then you are dumber
>> than you think I think you are.

>...
>
>	Are you suggesting that ARIN does _NOT_ publish data or that 
>	ARIN doesn't keep the data current, or something else?

I already said what I meant, twice, and quite clearly, I think.

If you don't get it after two repetitions, then I doubt that me trying
to rephrase it yet a third time is going to help your comprehension any.

Regards,
rfg