RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

• Previous message (by thread): RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
• Next message (by thread): RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 13:01 -0700, Matthew Petach a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:32 PM, George Bonser <gbonser at seven.com> wrote:
> >> I doubt that 1500 is (still) widely used in our Internet... Might be,
> >> though, that most of us don't go all the way to 9k.
> >>
> >> mh
> >
> > Last week I asked the operator of fairly major public peering points if they supported anything larger than 1500 MTU.  The answer was "no".
> >
> 
> There's still a metric buttload of SONET interfaces in the core that
> won't go above 4470.
> 
> So, you might conceivably get 4k MTU at some point in the future, but
> it's really, *really* unlikely you'll get to 9k MTU any time in the next
> decade.

Right, though I'm unsure of "decade" since we're moving off SDH/Sonet
quite agressively.

mh

> 
> Matt

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20101106/c749d294/attachment.sig>

• Previous message (by thread): RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
• Next message (by thread): RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]