Securing the BGP or controlling it?
deleskie at gmail.com
deleskie at gmail.com
Mon May 10 22:32:51 UTC 2010
I've worked for a couple of very large providers. I can't speak for what the do they do today but both where very serious about proper filtering. I only hope they both still do it.
-jim
------Original Message------
From: Hank Nussbacher
To: Thomas Magill
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
Sent: May 10, 2010 3:56 PM
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Thomas Magill wrote:
> All of the major providers I have worked with have required proof of
> 'ownership' of address space or an LoA from the registered holder of
> that space before they would allow advertisements from me, which are
> then filtered. Is this not the norm? I can understand if they are
> talking about an operator making a mistake, but the article seems to
> imply that anyone running BGP can bring down the Internet... I think
> any competent provider can easily eliminate this threat from customers.
> Are there any types of penalties if an ISP is found to not be taking
> adequate precautions, other than the possible threat of losing business?
ROTFLMAO. Competent provider? Penalties? Threats? You made my day.
-Hank
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
More information about the NANOG
mailing list