Using private APNIC range in US

Tom Ammon tom.ammon at utah.edu
Thu Mar 18 11:48:52 CDT 2010


RFC1918 is a good place to start ;)

On 3/18/2010 10:22 AM, Jaren Angerbauer wrote:
> Thanks all for the on / off list responses on this.  I acknowledge I'm
> playing in territory I'm not familiar with, and was a bad idea to jump
> to the conclusion that this range was private.  I made that assumption
> originally because the entire /8 was owned by APNIC, and just figured
> since the registrar owned them, it must have been a private range. :S
>
> It sounds like this range was just recently assigned -- is there any
> document (RFC?) or source I could look through to learn more about
> this, and/or provide evidence to my client?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jaren
>
>    

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Ammon
Network Engineer
Office: 801.587.0976
Mobile: 801.674.9273

Center for High Performance Computing
University of Utah
http://www.chpc.utah.edu





More information about the NANOG mailing list