YouTube AS36561 began announcing 22.214.171.124/8
Derek J. Balling
dredd at megacity.org
Sat Mar 13 12:41:16 CST 2010
On Mar 12, 2010, at 4:45 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> There's no way it's as widely used, and generally speaking, it appears
> that those who have used it have done so out of ignorance and(/or?)
> stupidity, sometimes blindly following documentation without
> comprehending, etc.
I don't know about that. Before we abandoned our prior managed-hosting facility for stuff we managed ourselves, ALL of the servers they were managing were using 126.96.36.199/8 for their "internal" address schemes. And this is a pretty decent sized company (Terremark) who I would have thought would have had a clue on it.
That said, I agree "people who didn't listen to RFC1918 deserve every bit of pain that they've got coming to them", but I bet there's more morons out there than you're giving the universe credit for.
More information about the NANOG