1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?

Nathan nathan at stonekitty.net
Tue Mar 2 09:58:51 CST 2010


I'm sorry my RR update was ... too late?  Did this cause a problem for  
someone?

  --N

(AS36561)

On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:28, Larry Blunk <ljb at merit.edu> wrote:

>
> Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tomoya Yoshida <yoshida at nttv6.jp>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Geoff.
>>>
>>> I asked because I could see 1/8 of merit AS237 but couldn't see
>>> of origin AS36561 for those two in database.
>>> Even if it's an experiment and sort term, It's better to be  
>>> registerd
>>> in right origin I think. # It could be guessed but...
>>>
>>
>> which databases?
>>
>> morrowc at localhost:~$ whois -h rr.arin.net 1.2.3.0
>> % This is the ARIN Routing Registry.
>>
>> % Note: this output has been filtered.
>>
>> % Information related to '1.2.3.0/24AS36561'
>>
>> route:          1.2.3.0/24
>> descr:          YouTube, Inc.
>> descr:          901 Cherry Ave
>> descr:          San Bruno, CA 94066
>> descr:          US
>> origin:         AS36561
>> mnt-by:         MNT-YOUTU
>> source:         ARIN # Filtered
>>
>>
>> morrowc at localhost:~$ whois -h rr.arin.net 1.1.1.0
>> % This is the ARIN Routing Registry.
>>
>> % Note: this output has been filtered.
>>
>> % Information related to '1.1.1.0/24AS36561'
>>
>> route:          1.1.1.0/24
>> descr:          YouTube, Inc.
>> descr:          901 Cherry Ave
>> descr:          San Bruno, CA 94066
>> descr:          US
>> origin:         AS36561
>> mnt-by:         MNT-YOUTU
>> source:         ARIN # Filtered
>>
>> These ought to then get around to other IRR-ish-things when their
>> propogation times hit, yes?
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>
>
>    I'm not positive that this is still the case, but I believe that
> there can be quite a bit of latency in mirroring due to the
> way RIPE database code (which ARIN uses) works.   The
> last object(s) registered are not pushed to the mirror stream until
> the next object(s) are registered.    I believe RIPE regularly pushes
> a dummy object in order to keep it's mirrors more regularly
> synced.   I don't think that ARIN does this.   It's a bigger issue
> for ARIN as their routing registry is updated less frequently
> than the RIPE routing registry.
>
>   According to our logs, the objects were not mirrored on
> the RADB server until about 2.5 hours after Tomoya posted
> his email (the objects were picked up from the ARIN
> mirror at 05:37:42 -0500 (EST)  March 2).
>
>
>
> --Larry
>
>
>
>>
>>> When RPKI comes, is it no problem??
>>>
>>>       -tomoya
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:17:45 +1100
>>> Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> |Hi,
>>> |
>>> |As I noted in the previous note quoted below, APNIC are  
>>> undertaking a second experiment with these two /24 routes  
>>> originated by AS 36561. These two /24s appear to be the major  
>>> attractors in the 1.0.0.0/8 space. YouTube have generously  
>>> provided assistance for this second experiment, and we are very  
>>> grateful for their help!
>>> |
>>> |  Geoff Huston
>>> |  APNIC
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |On 02/03/2010, at 6:59 PM, Tomoya Yoshida wrote:
>>> |
>>> |> Are these from youtube also?
>>> |>
>>> |> 1.1.1.0/24         *[BGP/170] 07:04:22, MED 0, localpref 100
>>> |>                      AS path: 2914 3356 36561 I
>>> |> 1.2.3.0/24         *[BGP/170] 07:01:21, MED 0, localpref 100
>>> |>                      AS path: 2914 3356 36561 I
>>> |>
>>> |>      tomoya
>>> |>
>>> |>
>>> |> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:34:02 +1100
>>> |> Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net> wrote:
>>> |>
>>> |> |
>>> |> |On 25/02/2010, at 6:13 AM, Alex H. Ryu wrote:
>>> |> |
>>> |> |>
>>> |> |> Today I jumped into one of our routers, and I found that 1.0.0.0/8 
>>>  is
>>> |> |> announced from AS237, which is MERIT.
>>> |> |>
>>> |> |>
>>> |> |>    Network            Next Hop        Metric LocPrf Weight  
>>> Path
>>> |> |> *>  1.0.0.0/8          4.59.200.5      0      60     0       
>>> (65001
>>> |> |> 65105) 3356 7018 237 i
>>> |> |>
>>> |> |> Is this supposed to be?
>>> |> |> I thought 1.0.0.0/8 is allocated to APNIC.
>>> |> |
>>> |> |Yes, this is supposed to be. This is one of a number of  
>>> planned experiments in advertising all and selected parts of 1/8  
>>> in the coming weeks.
>>> |> |
>>> |> |Geoff Huston
>>> |> |APNIC
>>> |>
>>> |> --
>>> |> Tomoya Yoshida <yoshida at nttv6.jp>
>>> |>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tomoya Yoshida <yoshida at nttv6.jp>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list