Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers

Wed Jun 9 15:19:24 UTC 2010

On 6/9/2010 08:09, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com> said:
>> That's why at least in the US by *regulation* you must have insurance
>> to be able to operate a car, instead of mitigating the safety issues
>> that represents a teenager texting while driving we deal with the
>> consequences.
> 
> The insurance requirement is a state-by-state thing.  It was only added
> here a few years ago, and I don't think it is universal.

Similar answer as the one for the brakes and tires thing.

Implementation may vary from state to state, just like the mechanical
standards thing.  When last I lived in California, there was no
"insurance" requirement but there was a "proof of financial
responsibility" requirement that was most easily (for most people) by
carrying insurance to certain standards for Public Liability and
Property Damage.

-- 
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.

Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca

ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml