Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
Matthew Walster
matthew at walster.org
Fri Jul 30 10:11:04 UTC 2010
On 30 July 2010 09:53, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> 2. Yes, they are already available. A moderate PC with 4 Gig-E
> ports can actually route all four of them at near wire speed.
> For 10/100Mbps, you can get full featured CPE like the SRX-100
> for around $500. That's the upper end of the residential CPE
> price range, but, it's a small fraction of the cost of that functionality
> just 2 years ago.
A moderate PC is not a typical CPE. An SRX-100 is not a typical CPE. A
Draytek DSL modem/router is not a typical CPE.
Your typical CPE is, and always will be, a simple device. It will (and
should) contain no user configuration that is required for operation.
If it does, it's too complicated for the average user.
> Home sensor network and/or appliances
If it's really necessary to put these on a separate network, I highly
doubt anyone but the true gadget geek will bother.
> Kids net (nanny software?)
Should be sorted at the PC-level, not the network level. If it really
is going to be a network service, it should be off the home network
and a managed service by an ISP somewhere.
> Home entertainment systems
Really? A separate network just for an HTPC?
> Guest wireless
Wireless is polluted enough. Supposing everything's fixed in the
future and there is near-unlimited wireless spectrum, your average
user is just going to give the encryption key to the router to the
guest. Network management is not on the radar for 99.9% of resi users.
Seriously, this is getting silly. I'm not even going to respond any
more - if you genuinely think users care about network management,
you're wrong. They treat it as a black box, and that isn't going to
change for a long, long, long time.
M
More information about the NANOG
mailing list