I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical Integration WG for dummies

Franck Martin franck at genius.com
Mon Jul 26 18:11:54 CDT 2010


The question too, is which model is mitigating the best the presence of rogue registrars (like domain tasting registrars, etc..)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com>
To: "Eric Brunner-Williams" <brunner at nic-naa.net>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 27 July, 2010 10:00:03 AM
Subject: Re: I slogged through it so you don't have to -- ICANN Vertical 	Integration WG for dummies

I found Milton Mueller's summary - noted at
http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1006- useful.

Is there anything there that you would disagree with?

j


On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
<brunner at nic-naa.net> wrote:

> Actually the alliances visible at present are:
>
> JN2 proposal: Verisign, NeuStar, NetSol and eNom and others,
>
> RACK proposal: Afilas, PIR, GoDaddy, and others, including CORE.
>
> I look forward to your public comments, here or at the ICANN comment site.
>
> Eric
>
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
  Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------





More information about the NANOG mailing list