Looking for comments
nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
Fri Jul 23 23:13:25 CDT 2010
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:18:39 +0100
Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> On 23/07/2010 01:17, Mark Smith wrote:
> > Does this qualify? What the customer sees is delivered over IPv6,
> > unlike the CPE management problem, where the ISP is the "IPv6 customer".
> > "IPv6: The Future of IPTV? In Japan it isn't the future, it's now."
> > http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3795086/IPv6-The-Future-of-IPTV.htm
> I understand that there are several networks doing this; the STB - like the
> CPE modem - is managed by the service provider and the customer has no
> management / control access over it. The customer stays on ipv4 for their
> regular access product.
> Someone offline pointed me at the Google IPv6 Implementors 2010 conference,
> at which:
> > https://sites.google.com/site/ipv6implementors/2010/agenda/13_Byrne_T-Mobile_IPv6GoogleMeeting.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1
> This is genuinely interesting.
Certainly is. I've generally classified mobile operators as people who
are heavily on the side of walled gardens. It's refreshing to see one
advocating e2e and global reachability.
More information about the NANOG