On another security note... (of sorts)

Sean Donelan sean at donelan.com
Fri Jul 16 07:49:45 UTC 2010


On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:46:24 EDT, "J. Oquendo" said:
>> RFP anyone.. Botnet Mitigation for Networks surely collectively it would
>> and CAN work.
>
> A nice idea, but consider if a more automated tool/system was created to
> behead a botnet (50,000 null0 routes to blackhole all the nodes? Or accept
> collateral damage? etc).  Now consider that jujutsu is designed around using
> the opponent's energy against him.
>
> How can this possibly go wrong? :)


Damned if they do, Damned if they don't.

It seems like every 4-6 weeks people alternate between ISPs are bad 
because they don't try to prevent X, Y or Z; and then 4-6 weeks later
ISPs are bad because they tried to prevent A, B or C.  It doesn't matter
what A, B, C or X, Y, Z are; it must be the ISPs fault.

Everyone agrees that ISPs are bad, they just disagree about what ISPs
are supposed to do about whatever.

And so it goes...




More information about the NANOG mailing list