Anyone see a game changer here?

Sun Jan 24 13:59:25 UTC 2010

On 1/24/10 7:48 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gadi Evron<ge at linuxbox.org>  wrote:
>> On 1/24/10 6:37 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
>>>
>>> So... you're taking incomplete information hyped up by "tech"
>>> reporters operating based on leaks from people tangential to an
>>> investigation as fact, and deciding that if Google doesn't tell you
>>> the details of an ongoing criminal investigation that you'll assume
>>> they broke the law.
>>
>> No. I write there's incomplete information, mention what possibly happened,
>> what alternatives exist, and ask for more data.
>>
>> Yes, if Google did do it, I support the move.
>>
>> Do you have new information to kill speculation, or should these "tech"
>> reporters keep at it?
>
> Nobody who knows anything is going to say anything, as this is an
> ongoing criminal investigation.  I'm afraid I'll have to leave you to
> your speculation.

Fair enough.

>
> Damian

-- 
Gadi Evron,
ge at linuxbox.org.

Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/