SORBS on autopilot?
Michelle Sullivan
matthew at sorbs.net
Fri Jan 15 20:17:11 UTC 2010
Logan Vig wrote:
>
> Here are some tickets to review:
>
> 205929
>
> 206524
>
> 207964
>
> 208986
>
> and for the /24's which finally resulted in the /18 being delisted:
>
> 208996-209062
>
Well from the initial look you kept submitting new tickets and the SORBS
staff kept merging them into the latest ticket as previously stated.
You in effect delayed any human response yourself.... and it looks like
you managed to exploit a flaw in the system to bypass the delisting
rules as you were not entitled to be delisted at the time.
I'd suggest you might want to not push things or I will review the
entire entry with a view to correcting any incorrect delisting. No
that's not retaliatory, that's just correcting an error that you have
just alerted me to... (if however, you are entitled not to be listed
now, the entry would not be re-instated..)
Michelle
More information about the NANOG
mailing list