History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?

• Previous message (by thread): History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
• Next message (by thread): History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2010-02-14, at 17:17, Mark Andrews wrote:

> I don't care what internal routing tricks are used, they are still
> under the *one* external route and as such subject to single points
> of failure and as such don't have enough independence.

Are you asserting architectural control over what Level3 decide to do with their own servers, Mark? :-)

If their goal is distribute a service for the benefit of their own customers, then keeping all anycast nodes associated with that service on-net seems entirely sensible.


Joe

• Previous message (by thread): History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
• Next message (by thread): History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]