Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation.

Mike. the.lists at mgm51.com
Wed Dec 15 20:29:28 UTC 2010


On 12/15/2010 at 10:25 AM Bryan Irvine wrote:

|On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Mike. <the.lists at mgm51.com> wrote:
|>
|> On 12/15/2010 at 9:17 AM Ben wrote:
|>
|> |On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Stefan Fouant <
|> |sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:
|> |
|> |> > -----Original Message-----
|> |> > From: mikea [mailto:mikea at mikea.ath.cx]
|> |> > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:28 AM
|> |> > To: nanog at nanog.org
|> |> > Subject: Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC
implementation.
|> [snip]
|>  =============
|>
|>
|> Another relevant comment from the OpenBSD tech mailing list:
|>
|>
|> http://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129237675106730&w=2
|
|Also, the original sender of the email confirms he sent it. Also
|mentions PF as a target in the follow-up.
|
|http://blogs.csoonline.com/1296/an_fbi_backdoor_in_openbsd
|
|Anyone know the trustworthy-ness of 'csoonline'?
 =============



Someone's putting up a bounty ...


http://maycontaintracesofbolts.blogspot.com/2010/12/openbsd-ipsec-backdo
or-allegations.html










More information about the NANOG mailing list