Pointer for documentation on actually delivering IPv6
Joel Jaeggli
joelja at bogus.com
Tue Dec 7 14:23:07 UTC 2010
On 12/7/10 5:18 AM, david raistrick wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
>> purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way)
>> won't have much luck finding a vendor that will provide the NAT for
>> you to do it with.
>
> [with my flame-retardant hat installed firmly]
>
> So what's the IPV6 solution for PCI compliance, where 1.3.8 requires the
> use of RFC1918 space? Admitedly, it's been a year or two since I last
> had to engineer around that particular set of rules...but it's life or
> death for a lot of folks.
Document a compensating control...
That particular case is trivial to demonstrate that the in scope
addresses are not exposed to the internet.
>
>
> --
> david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> drais at icantclick.org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list