Trying to Make Sense of the Comcast/Level 3 Dispute

Fri Dec 3 18:43:06 UTC 2010

On Dec 3, 2010, at 1:34 PM, christian koch wrote:

> my guess is the info for that was pulled off comcast's route server, where
> only tata is seen

Asymmetric routing on the Internet?  What will they think of next?!

That said, does changing the name of the middle network change the substance of the post?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

P.S. And does Y! have a route-server to figure this stuff out? :)

> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com>wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:
>>> In a message written on Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:40:01PM -0800, Paul
>> Ferguson wrote:
>>>> Interesting article:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/sjs/trying-make-sense-comcast-level-3
>>>> - -dispute
>>> 
>>> Here's an excellent summary, complete with some pictures:
>>> 
>>> 
>> http://www.voxel.net/blog/2010/12/peering-disputes-comcast-level-3-and-you
>>> 
>>> --
>>>      Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
>>>       PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Unfortunately, they got at least part of the diagram wrong;
>> Yahoo uses Global Crossing to reach Comcast, not TATA.
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>> 
> 