Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions

Joe Provo nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net
Fri Dec 3 12:38:34 UTC 2010


On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:49:53PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com> wrote:
> 
> > fair game for reverse billing. ?If it does, it's going to completely
> > eliminate "transit" as a commercial offering; instead, we'll
> > all be stuck doing settlements in every direction for
> > traffic...and that's just *way* too much paperwork. ?^_^;
> 
> oh! that's the LD network.. that worked out so darned well, can we do
> it again? and can we have the ITU manage it for us? please? please?
> please? :)

Obviously, that's what (3) and GLBX want back.  Perhps they are feeling
nostalgic.

-- 
             RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE




More information about the NANOG mailing list