iPhone updates and required bandwidth

Justin Wilson lists at mtin.net
Wed Aug 18 14:29:46 CDT 2010


    Apple is ultra protective of their mobile stuff.  It¹s just going to get
worse in the attempts to circumvent the devices being ³Jailbroken².  Quite a
bit of behind the scenes checksums and re-checks going on.  They want to
make sure the device cleanly downloads, cleanly installs, and is not
tampered with. Itunes is responsible for doing all this in the background.

    Justin
-- 
Justin Wilson <j2sw at mtin.net>
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support




From: Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott at oicr.on.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:20:52 -0400
To: JoeSox <joesox at gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: iPhone updates and required bandwidth

sorry Joe if i wasn't clear,  what i was trying to say is I know there is a
solution to address the bandwidth issue caused by updates for OS X machines,
I am unsure if they have a similar solution for their hand held devices.
I am assuming they do or soon will.   I'm on the road right now,  when I
return to the office I'll take a look at the OS X update server and see if
there is any provisions for the iPhones and friends.

perhaps a squid caching server in-between the device network and internet?
back in the day this is how i mitigated other many to one client update
issues.

-g




On Aug 18, 2010, at 3:07 PM, JoeSox wrote:

> Interesting.
> Do you have to configure the iPhone devices or just use its standard settings?
> 
> --
> Thanks, Joe
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott at oicr.on.ca>
wrote:
>> I set up an OS X server which hosts updates for the rest of the company,  so
the OS X client machines poll/pull updates from the internal machine as opposed
to 100 of them pulling the same updates over the internet.  saves bucket loads
of bandwidth and  you can "pre ok" individual packages,  so the client just
updates without prompting.   I'm not sure but I suspect they might have
something which allows their other devices to poll this same source.  it would
seem reasonable anyway..
>> 
>> probably not a very useful answer but there it is.  8)
>> 
>> 
>> -g
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 18, 2010, at 2:54 PM, JoeSox wrote:
>> 
>>> Am I the only one that gets ticked off at the Apple iPhone update
>>> procedure and the amount of bandwidth it needs?
>>> Is there any secret I am missing to cut down on the required bandwidth
>>> needed for it (caching the update somewhere etc)?  I don't own an
>>> iPhone (DroidX user here) and am unfamiliar with the update, all I
>>> know is it uses tons of BW.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Thanks, Joe
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 






More information about the NANOG mailing list