Connectivity to an IPv6-only site
joelja at bogus.com
Fri Apr 30 13:23:28 CDT 2010
On 4/26/2010 8:07 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Stephen Sprunk<stephen at sprunk.org> wrote:
>> Don't forget the hotspot vendor that returns an address of 0.0.0.1 for
>> every A query if you have previously done an AAAA query for the same
>> name (and timed out). That's a fun one.
> so... aside from the every 3 months bitching on this list (and some on
> v6ops maybe) about these sorts of things, what's happening to
> tell/educate/warn/notice the hotspot-vendors that this sort of
> practice (along with 'everything is at 220.127.116.11!') is just a bad plan?
> How can users, even more advanced users, tell a hotspot vendor in a
> meaningful way that their 'solution' is broken?
Years ago I talked to a startup's funders about the fact that they had
made a design decision to build hardcoded unassigned /8s into a captive
portal and mobility gateway.
We didn't buy their product, they changed it, company folded.
The most meaningful thing one can do is vote with your wallet.
More information about the NANOG