the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

• Previous message (by thread): the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
• Next message (by thread): the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of the v6 internet 

Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?

Regards,
-drc

• Previous message (by thread): the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
• Next message (by thread): the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]