Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
Scott Weeks
surfer at mauigateway.com
Thu Apr 22 17:23:42 UTC 2010
--- jimb at jsbc.cc wrote:
From: Jim Burwell <jimb at jsbc.cc>
I think this is different. They're talking about using a new IPv6 for
each connection. RFC4941 just changes it over time IIRC. IMHO that's
still pretty good privacy, at least on par with a NATed IPv4 from the
outside perspective, especially if you rotated through temporary IPv6s
fairly frequently.
Of course, for browsers, as someone else mentioned, it's somewhat moot
because of cookies.
--------------------------------------------
Manage your cookies.
preferences => privacy & security => cookies => select "ask for each cookie"
Noisy in the beginning and then settles down after a while. Surprising, though, in what is tracked, so it's worth doing for a while just to observe. Oh, yeah, also manage your Flash cookies:
http://macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html
scott
More information about the NANOG
mailing list