Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
LarrySheldon at cox.net
Thu Apr 22 10:13:49 CDT 2010
On 4/22/2010 10:04, John Lightfoot wrote:
> That's Hedley.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com [mailto:bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM
> To: Simon Perreault
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
>> On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
>>> On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks
>>> up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound
>>> connection for anonymity purposes.
>> That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating
>> systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.
> not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars
> patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection.
Hedwig Eva Maria Kiesler aka Hedy Lamarr
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
More information about the NANOG