Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
jlightfoot at gmail.com
Thu Apr 22 10:04:54 CDT 2010
From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com [mailto:bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM
To: Simon Perreault
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
> >On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks
> >up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound
> >connection for anonymity purposes.
> That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating
> systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.
not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars
patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection.
More information about the NANOG